<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review: Quantum of Solace</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/</link>
	<description>No, Mr. Bond, I expect you to blog!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 21:48:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeni Rhinehart</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-3260</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeni Rhinehart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-3260</guid>
		<description>I love the reviews above, until I got to the last few which said the movie was bad.  

I like the movie, it was good, but not great.  

I think the action at the beginning was confusing, too jerky, dialog not clear.  I watched it on DVD &amp; I had to go back &amp; replay parts with the sound turned up and/or in slow motion to understand what they were saying &amp; doing.  During that scene in Sienna where Mr White was sitting in the chair talking, after the shooting started, it just jumped &amp; jerked &amp; went haywire a while.  It took several viewings for me to figure out the plot.  

The scene in Port-au-Prince in the car with Camille (Olga Kurylenko) was the same problem, I had to rewind &amp; listen closely &amp; then go back &amp; slowly forward.  

Is it just me, or do a lot of productions nowadays neglect the sound portion of production?  Used to be they would dub in lines in the studio if they weren&#039;t clear in the original shooting.  Seems they&#039;re skimping on sound now.  

Actors used to be taught to clearly articulate each word so as to be understood.  Now, they&#039;re mumbling.  

But, I think the comments about Quantum of Solace being a sequel to Casino Royale are right on.  If I hadn&#039;t seen CR first, this movie wouldn&#039;t have made a lot of sense.  Plotwise, I could&#039;ve followed it, but emotionally, Bond&#039;s dilemma wouldn&#039;t have made as much sense. I do wish they had gotten Craig to emote more.  Some closeups would&#039;ve been nice, in the right places.  I couldn&#039;t tell what he was supposed to be feeling.  And the scene where Mathis died in his arms - I wanted more.  Mathis was like his father-confessor, he was the soul of the movie, of the plot.  

Another thing; I am confused about the parachuting scene.  They hit the ground extremely hard, I mean, I&#039;ve seen parachuters hit hard in real life &amp; they don&#039;t get up, not any time soon after.  I saw one guy in an elite US military parachuting unit hit so hard he took a half hour to get up on his feet.  You don&#039;t just recover fast from that.  So I don&#039;t understand this part.  How is it that both of them, Bond &amp; Camille, came down hard using one parachute that wasn&#039;t opened early enough &amp; literally crashed into the ground hard enough to do some extreme damage, yet the next scene with them had them just there, talking?  Isn&#039;t something missing here?  Did they cut out some scenes due to Craig&#039;s injuries?  

I was really looking forward to this movie, &amp; it&#039;s good, but I wish they&#039;d reshot some of the scenes to make it clearer.  It could - and should - have had more production time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the reviews above, until I got to the last few which said the movie was bad.  </p>
<p>I like the movie, it was good, but not great.  </p>
<p>I think the action at the beginning was confusing, too jerky, dialog not clear.  I watched it on DVD &amp; I had to go back &amp; replay parts with the sound turned up and/or in slow motion to understand what they were saying &amp; doing.  During that scene in Sienna where Mr White was sitting in the chair talking, after the shooting started, it just jumped &amp; jerked &amp; went haywire a while.  It took several viewings for me to figure out the plot.  </p>
<p>The scene in Port-au-Prince in the car with Camille (Olga Kurylenko) was the same problem, I had to rewind &amp; listen closely &amp; then go back &amp; slowly forward.  </p>
<p>Is it just me, or do a lot of productions nowadays neglect the sound portion of production?  Used to be they would dub in lines in the studio if they weren&#8217;t clear in the original shooting.  Seems they&#8217;re skimping on sound now.  </p>
<p>Actors used to be taught to clearly articulate each word so as to be understood.  Now, they&#8217;re mumbling.  </p>
<p>But, I think the comments about Quantum of Solace being a sequel to Casino Royale are right on.  If I hadn&#8217;t seen CR first, this movie wouldn&#8217;t have made a lot of sense.  Plotwise, I could&#8217;ve followed it, but emotionally, Bond&#8217;s dilemma wouldn&#8217;t have made as much sense. I do wish they had gotten Craig to emote more.  Some closeups would&#8217;ve been nice, in the right places.  I couldn&#8217;t tell what he was supposed to be feeling.  And the scene where Mathis died in his arms &#8211; I wanted more.  Mathis was like his father-confessor, he was the soul of the movie, of the plot.  </p>
<p>Another thing; I am confused about the parachuting scene.  They hit the ground extremely hard, I mean, I&#8217;ve seen parachuters hit hard in real life &amp; they don&#8217;t get up, not any time soon after.  I saw one guy in an elite US military parachuting unit hit so hard he took a half hour to get up on his feet.  You don&#8217;t just recover fast from that.  So I don&#8217;t understand this part.  How is it that both of them, Bond &amp; Camille, came down hard using one parachute that wasn&#8217;t opened early enough &amp; literally crashed into the ground hard enough to do some extreme damage, yet the next scene with them had them just there, talking?  Isn&#8217;t something missing here?  Did they cut out some scenes due to Craig&#8217;s injuries?  </p>
<p>I was really looking forward to this movie, &amp; it&#8217;s good, but I wish they&#8217;d reshot some of the scenes to make it clearer.  It could &#8211; and should &#8211; have had more production time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2275</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 01:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2275</guid>
		<description>I think the new bond movie was a joke.  It misses all the old elements of a bond movie, and Daniel Craig as the new bond is weak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the new bond movie was a joke.  It misses all the old elements of a bond movie, and Daniel Craig as the new bond is weak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2262</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 01:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2262</guid>
		<description>Quantum of solace - the worst movie of all bond movies, no special stunt, no gadget, why change the intro? I wouldn’t even buy the dvd, not worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quantum of solace &#8211; the worst movie of all bond movies, no special stunt, no gadget, why change the intro? I wouldn’t even buy the dvd, not worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WyBondFan</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>WyBondFan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>All I can say is that QoS was a HUGE disappointment!  I am a long-time Bond fan and own them all from VHS to DVD.  I love Daniel Craig as Bond and think CR was fabulous - so what happened?  The story line moved so fast that it was confusing, the Bond that we all know and love - sex, smartass, and savvy - was no where in sight in this film.  The whole thematic-Bond:  Gone!  I have never been so deflated and hope it doesn&#039;t happen again.  Otherwise the prize of finding Craig will be lost!  And remake Her Majesty&#039;s Secret Service will ya - another dud and one of the most important story lines, it was boring, an other NOT-Bond make!  

Signed - Big D!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All I can say is that QoS was a HUGE disappointment!  I am a long-time Bond fan and own them all from VHS to DVD.  I love Daniel Craig as Bond and think CR was fabulous &#8211; so what happened?  The story line moved so fast that it was confusing, the Bond that we all know and love &#8211; sex, smartass, and savvy &#8211; was no where in sight in this film.  The whole thematic-Bond:  Gone!  I have never been so deflated and hope it doesn&#8217;t happen again.  Otherwise the prize of finding Craig will be lost!  And remake Her Majesty&#8217;s Secret Service will ya &#8211; another dud and one of the most important story lines, it was boring, an other NOT-Bond make!  </p>
<p>Signed &#8211; Big D!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosie</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2201</link>
		<dc:creator>Rosie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 02:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2201</guid>
		<description>I wrote this review of the movie - &lt;a href=&quot;http://ladylavinia.livejournal.com/168775.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&lt;b&gt;&quot;QUANTUM OF SOLACE&quot; Review&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote this review of the movie &#8211; <a href="http://ladylavinia.livejournal.com/168775.html" rel="nofollow"><b>&#8220;QUANTUM OF SOLACE&#8221; Review</b></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rundangerously</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2196</link>
		<dc:creator>rundangerously</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2196</guid>
		<description>i enjoyed quantum - and think it could easily be part II of a trilogy.  nice snippets of earlier bonds (easy was goldfinger, for your eyes only, but a few more lurking in there).

i thought shorter (under 2 hours) worked.  could easily have taken off 10-15 minutes of poker sequence from casino royale - that was the only part that dragged, imo.

i didn&#039;t like the general comments that this was a &quot;revenge&quot; flick to casino&#039;s love story.  way too much of a simplication.

fwiw, here is review i wrote up:

http://rundangerously.blogspot.com/2008/11/james-bond-quantum-of-solace-movie.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i enjoyed quantum &#8211; and think it could easily be part II of a trilogy.  nice snippets of earlier bonds (easy was goldfinger, for your eyes only, but a few more lurking in there).</p>
<p>i thought shorter (under 2 hours) worked.  could easily have taken off 10-15 minutes of poker sequence from casino royale &#8211; that was the only part that dragged, imo.</p>
<p>i didn&#8217;t like the general comments that this was a &#8220;revenge&#8221; flick to casino&#8217;s love story.  way too much of a simplication.</p>
<p>fwiw, here is review i wrote up:</p>
<p><a href="http://rundangerously.blogspot.com/2008/11/james-bond-quantum-of-solace-movie.html" rel="nofollow">http://rundangerously.blogspot.com/2008/11/james-bond-quantum-of-solace-movie.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie Fellrath</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2167</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie Fellrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2167</guid>
		<description>A good point, the truth.  I too had some trouble with some of the accents in this movie, particularly Almaric&#039;s.  I have problems with accents anyway, though, so I thought maybe it was just me.  Sound quality could have been a tad better, then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good point, the truth.  I too had some trouble with some of the accents in this movie, particularly Almaric&#8217;s.  I have problems with accents anyway, though, so I thought maybe it was just me.  Sound quality could have been a tad better, then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the truth</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2159</link>
		<dc:creator>the truth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 22:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2159</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll never hate a Bond movie, but I too was tiny bit disappointed. Way too many extreme close ups during the action sequences. Message to all directors: please pull your camera back. I want to see what&#039;s going on.

Also, a lot of the dialogue got swallowed up. I found myself wondering what was just said. I don&#039;t know if this was because of the many foreign accents or because most of the lead actors tended to be low talkers.

I would also like to see a few smiles from Daniel Craig. I don&#039;t want to see a return to the smirky, clowny Roger Moore or Pierce Brosnan versions of Bond...but Daniel needs to have a little fun. I liked his &quot;hand cuffs&quot; quip, he just needed another fun line or two.

Overall, I give it a solid B. Can&#039;t wait for Bond 23 in 2010!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll never hate a Bond movie, but I too was tiny bit disappointed. Way too many extreme close ups during the action sequences. Message to all directors: please pull your camera back. I want to see what&#8217;s going on.</p>
<p>Also, a lot of the dialogue got swallowed up. I found myself wondering what was just said. I don&#8217;t know if this was because of the many foreign accents or because most of the lead actors tended to be low talkers.</p>
<p>I would also like to see a few smiles from Daniel Craig. I don&#8217;t want to see a return to the smirky, clowny Roger Moore or Pierce Brosnan versions of Bond&#8230;but Daniel needs to have a little fun. I liked his &#8220;hand cuffs&#8221; quip, he just needed another fun line or two.</p>
<p>Overall, I give it a solid B. Can&#8217;t wait for Bond 23 in 2010!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 14:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>Jamie, good thoughts. I do like the scenes Joe talked about, but I think even in the opera, the filming style could have aimed for a clearer narrative. 

My favorite scenes are the ones with Mathis, the scene with Bond and Camille preparing before they enter Greene&#039;s lair (I&#039;ve got a post planned about that), Fields&#039;s final shot, and of course the opera.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie, good thoughts. I do like the scenes Joe talked about, but I think even in the opera, the filming style could have aimed for a clearer narrative. </p>
<p>My favorite scenes are the ones with Mathis, the scene with Bond and Camille preparing before they enter Greene&#8217;s lair (I&#8217;ve got a post planned about that), Fields&#8217;s final shot, and of course the opera.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Lipp</title>
		<link>http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/2008/11/14/review-quantum-of-solace/comment-page-1/#comment-2149</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Lipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 22:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jamesbondfanbook.com/?p=969#comment-2149</guid>
		<description>rl, first, I resent your implication that viewers who didn&#039;t understand the movie just hadn&#039;t done their homework. First, because this is a fansite and most viewers here HAVE seen CR multiple times, and second, it is the obligation of the filmmaker to make a sequel understandable to newcomers. If you have to do homework to understand a film, the filmmaker is generally not doing his job.

There were many plot elements that were quite muddy in QOS that had no precursor in CR. What was Greene&#039;s true motivation? What was going on with his water scheme? Why did Greene keep Camille alive after putting a hit on her? With a huge organization at his disposal, why did he hire an outside hitman? Why did he kill Fields and why with oil? 

And really, if you&#039;ve seen CR in the recent past, you should know that Mathis was NOT a double-agent. This was explained in both movies: LeChiffre said Mathis was a double to divert suspicion from the real double: Vesper. Mathis was tortured and interrogated anyway, in case there were two doubles. When he was cleared, the British bought him the villa we see in QOS as recompense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rl, first, I resent your implication that viewers who didn&#8217;t understand the movie just hadn&#8217;t done their homework. First, because this is a fansite and most viewers here HAVE seen CR multiple times, and second, it is the obligation of the filmmaker to make a sequel understandable to newcomers. If you have to do homework to understand a film, the filmmaker is generally not doing his job.</p>
<p>There were many plot elements that were quite muddy in QOS that had no precursor in CR. What was Greene&#8217;s true motivation? What was going on with his water scheme? Why did Greene keep Camille alive after putting a hit on her? With a huge organization at his disposal, why did he hire an outside hitman? Why did he kill Fields and why with oil? </p>
<p>And really, if you&#8217;ve seen CR in the recent past, you should know that Mathis was NOT a double-agent. This was explained in both movies: LeChiffre said Mathis was a double to divert suspicion from the real double: Vesper. Mathis was tortured and interrogated anyway, in case there were two doubles. When he was cleared, the British bought him the villa we see in QOS as recompense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
